At the beginning of modern times, there was an agreement for the second person, which singularus all the verbs in the current form, as well as in the past some usual verbs. It was usually in the shape-east, but -st and t also occurred. Note that this does not affect endings for other people and numbers. Ronald Reagan approved the agreement and the USTR reviewed Korean practices until the end of his term. Average English agreement, borrowed from the Anglo-French agreement, approval, of the agreement “to ask to accept” – -ment -ment agreement or Concord (abbreviated agr) occurs when a word changes the form, according to the other words to which it refers.  This is a case of bending and usually involves making the value of a grammatical category (such as sex or person) “agree” between different words or parts of the sentence. In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name. On the other hand, a verb like leaving (the different words are pronounced in the type of kursilem are pronounced /paa/): such correspondence also ends up with predictors: the man is great (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”). (In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) Another characteristic is the concordance in personalities that have different forms for different sexes: in Hungarian, the verbs have a multipersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusator).
There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). Case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only personal pronouns and pronouns with a case mark). An agreement between these pronouns can sometimes be respected: the agreement usually involves matching the value of a grammatical category between different elements of a sentence (or sometimes between sentences, as in some cases where a pronoun is needed to agree with its predecessor or reference). Some categories that often trigger grammatical chords are listed below. According to the IAEA, the agreement has three main points that Iran has all respected. Languages cannot have a conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. Note that some of the changes mentioned above are also (in the singular) when the following word begins with a vowel: the and become it there, you and the l, my will be my (as if the name would be masculine) and it will be this.
Compared to English, Latin is an example of a very curved language.